Watching the Morning Meeting Podcast on YouTube, 2Way, with Mark Halperin, Sean Spicer, and Dan Turrentine on 12/18/24 about drones was shocking. The guys on the podcast spoke to a man named Scott in Bosie, Idaho who was an expert in counter drones systems. Scott broke down what he says might be the truth about drones and our government. Scott mused out loud that the American Government cannot protect the public from drones and they do not want to admit that the Emperor has no clothes in this regard. Drone detection technology has advanced significantly over the years, yet it remains fraught with limitations, particularly in urban environments. Despite the U.S. government’s best efforts to develop robust systems, tracking drones effectively, especially in densely populated areas, remains an elusive goal. This technological gap underscores the reality that Americans cannot fully depend on current systems to shield them from potential drone-related threats.

Drones are inherently difficult to detect because of their small size, low acoustic profile, and ability to operate at varying altitudes and speeds. Unlike larger aircraft, drones often lack distinct radar signatures, making them challenging for traditional radar systems to identify. Many consumer and commercial drones are constructed from lightweight materials such as plastic or carbon fiber, reducing their visibility to radar and other electromagnetic detection methods. In addition to physical characteristics, the sheer diversity in drone models compounds the detection problem. From palm-sized quadcopters to sophisticated unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) used by militaries, the wide range of drone technologies creates an enormous detection challenge. Each type of drone may emit different signals, use unique communication protocols, or produce varying levels of noise, requiring multiple layers of detection technology to cover all possibilities effectively.

Urban areas present a challenging scenario for drone detection. Cities are filled with buildings, power lines, and other physical obstacles that interfere with detection technologies such as radar and acoustic sensors. The complex layout of urban environments creates countless blind spots where drones can operate undetected. Furthermore, the high concentration of radio frequency (RF) signals from cell towers, Wi-Fi networks, and other electronic devices creates significant interference for RF-based detection systems. Drones also blend seamlessly into the urban soundscape. The buzz of a drone’s propellers can easily be mistaken for everyday noises like air conditioning units, traffic, or construction equipment. This makes acoustic detection—a crucial component of many counter-drone systems—highly unreliable in cities.

The anonymity of drones in urban settings also extends to their operators. The ability to fly drones remotely means that operators can launch and control drones from locations far from the drone’s operating area. This creates a layer of detachment that complicates any effort to identify and neutralize malicious actors. The lack of effective drone detection technology is compounded by policy limitations. Current FAA regulations and airspace monitoring frameworks are ill-suited for the real-time tracking of small, fast-moving objects like drones. While the government has invested heavily in counter-drone technologies, these systems often face significant hurdles in terms of integration, cost, and scalability.

Efforts to implement widespread detection and mitigation measures, such as geofencing and GPS jamming, also come with their challenges. These approaches may inadvertently disrupt legitimate drone operations or affect other communication systems in urban areas, further complicating their deployment. The truth is that the American government is far from being able to protect its citizens from the potential threats posed by drones. The combination of technological limitations, urban complexity, and regulatory gaps leaves Americans vulnerable to the misuse of this rapidly proliferating technology.

While advancements in counter-drone systems will undoubtedly continue, achieving a comprehensive solution that can reliably track and neutralize drones in urban environments remains a daunting task. If you combine drones & Japan’s “Operation PX” for example, you will see that it is not hyperbole to say that drones can be used as weapons of mass destruction and that your government cannot protect you from these WMDs anytime soon. Google “Operation PX” and then think about the rise of drones in regards to Japan’s plans in the past and juxtapose all of that with today’s world in which drones are flying all over the place above us relatively unencumbered for the most part.

C. Rich

CRich@AmericaSpeaksInk.com

C. Rich

C. Rich is the voice behind America Speaks Ink, home to the America First Movement. As an author, poet, freelance ghostwriter, and blogger, C. Rich brings a “baked-in” perspective shaped by growing up on the streets and beaches of South Florida in the 1970s-1980s and brings a quintessential Generation-X point of view.

Rich’s writing journey began in 2008 with coverage of the Casey Anthony trial and has since evolved into a wide-ranging exploration of politics, culture, and the issues that define our times. Follow C. Rich’s writing odyssey here at America Speaks Ink and on Amazon with a four-book series on Donald Trump called “Trump Era: The MAGA Files” and many other books and subjects C. Rich is known to cover.

“America Speaks Ink is a Google News approved source for Opinion”