Where in the Mission Statement of The Food and Drug Administration does it say that if they have jurisdiction over a product that kills five-hundred thousand people a year, they regulate it and not ban it completely?

If there was a breakfast cereal or some peanut butter that killed hundreds of thousands of people a year, would they regulate it or pull it off the shelves? Now that tobacco is under the umbrella of the power of the FDA, if they don’t ban it aren’t they complicit in all these deaths?

How could the FDA legally not ban a known product under its jurisdiction that kills people? Doesn’t the law require the FDA to protect us from harmful products on the shelf? How could they in the arena of the law turn their backs to a lung cancer holocaust?

Wouldn’t it be fair to say if the FDA doesn’t ban Tobacco that they have lost credibility and that the original purpose of the agency has been completely changed? To take over the most pernicious product in America and regulate it instead of banning it, renders The Food and Drug Administration a fraud and another hypocritical government agency that now is complicit in the horrendous deaths of millions to come. These are questions that I as a cigarette smoker would liked answered.

C. Rich

Popularity: 5%